跳到主要內容

同理心測驗整理

 

Name type author definition of empathy 說明
Balanced Emotional Empathy Scale (BEES) self rating scale (Mehrabian, 1996) the degree to which the respondent can vicariously experience another’s happiness or suffering 30 items
Basic Empathy Scale (BES) self rating scale (Jolliffe & Farrington, 2006). The BES is based on a definition of empathy proposed by Cohen and Strayer (1996) as the sharing and understanding of another’s emotional state or context resulting from experiencing the emotive state (affective) and understanding another’s (cognitive) emotions.
BES measures five basic emotions (fear, sadness, anger, and happiness) wherein the measurements relate more generally to cognitive and affective empathy and not to a non-specific affective state (e.g., anxiety).
Barrett-Lennard Relationship
Inventory
Patient-rating (Barrett-Lennard 1962)
Behavioural Test of
Interpersonal Skills
third person rating  (Gerrard &
Buzzell 1980)


Carkhuff Index of
Communication 

(Carkhuff 1969)
 
Emotional Empathy
Tendency Scale
self rating scale (Mehrabian & Epstein
1972)


Emotional Intelligence Scale  self rating scale (Schutte et al. 1998)

Empathic Communication
Skill B
self rating scale (Dokmen 1988)

Empathic Tendency
Scale
self rating scale (Dokmen 1989, 1990)

Empathizing/Systemizing Quotient (ESQ) self rating scale Auyeung et al., 2009

Empathy Construct Rating Scale of La Monica self rating scale (La Monica 1981)

Empathy Quotient (EQ) self rating scale Baron-Cohen & Wheelwright,
2004
the drive to identify another person’s emotions and thoughts, and to respond to these with an appropriate emotion 40 empathy items and 20 filler/control items
Empathy Rating Scale self rating scale (Ivey et al. 1980)

Empathy Scale self rating scale  (Gazda et al. 1977)

Hogan Empathy
Scale
self rating scale  (Hogan 1969)

Feeling and Thinking Scale (FTS) self rating scale (Garton & Gringart, 2005) Empathic Concern, Perspective Taking, Personal Distress, and
Fantasy.
an adaptation of the Interpersonal Reactivity Index (IRI, Davis, 1980) for use with children
Griffith Empathy Measure (GEM) third person rating (Dadds et al., 2008)
It is an adaption of the Bryant Index of Empathy (Bryant, 1982) used by parents to assess child and ado-
lescent empathy (Dadds et al., 2008).

The GEM contains 23 items that are rated on a 9-point Likert-type response scale to assess parents’ level of
agreement with statements concerning their child. The GEM appears to measure cognitive and affective compo-
nents of empathy (Dadds et al., 2008).
Interpersonal Reactivity
Index 
self rating scale (Davis 1980)
常見
Jefferson Scale of Physician Empathy self rating scale (Hojat et al. 2001)
常見,通常用在醫病關係
La Monica Empathy Profile 
(La Monica 1983)

Modified Layton Empathy
Test
self rating scale (Layton 1979)

Multidimensional Emotional Empathy Scale (MDEES)
(Caruso & Mayer, 1998)
Empathic Suffering, Positive Sharing,
Responsive Crying, Emotional Attention, Feeling for Others, and Emotional Contagion
multifaceted empathy test cognitive task Dziobek et al., 2008
觀看某個人在某個情境下的照片,參與者要從四個選項中選擇最符合照片中人的情緒狀態。
接著,參與者回報自己多能夠感受到相同的情緒
Perception of Empathy Inventory self rating scale  (Wheeler 1990)

Questionnaire of Cognitive and Affective Empathy (QCAE) self rating scale (Reniers, Corcoran, Drake, Shryane, & Vo¨llm, 2011). Both cognitive and affective components of empathy are measured.
自過去現存的量表修改而來
Questionnaire Measure of Emotional Empathy self rating scale QMEE; Mehrabian & Epstein,
1972


reading the mind in the eyes task cognitive task Baron-Cohen, Wheelwright, Hill, Raste, &
Plumb, 2001
情緒辨識 只看眼睛部份的照片,然後從選項當中選擇最符合的情緒狀態
Reynolds Empathy Scale
self rating scale (Reynolds 2000)

Scale of Empathic Skills
 (Dokmen 1989, 1990)

self defined empathy scale  Patient-rating, self rating scale Hall, 2021 並未定義何謂同理,而是向不同的參與者詢問,哪一種行為符合你心中的同理的定義
Staff–Patient
Interaction Response Scale 
third person rating (Watt-Watson et al. 2000); (Gallop et al. 1989)

Toronto Empathy Questionnaire (TEQ) self rating scale (Spreng,
McKinnon, Mar, & Levine, 2009)
著重在emotion empathy https://www.notion.so/47723ce22aa84c7ea137437a89933388

本量表發展時並沒有基於某個同理心的定義,而是從過去相關的量表中分析出較能夠反應同理心的單一因素的題目
Visual Analogue Scale
 (Wheeler et al. 1996)

Picture Viewing Paradigms (PVP) cognitive task, self rating scale (Westbury & Neumann, 2008) individual’s self-reported response to empathy-eliciting visual images  看情緒圖,被要求自評覺得自己有多能夠想像自己若是畫面中目標的感受。也就是能夠設身處地的能力

to what degree you are able to imagine feeling and experiencing what the
target is experiencing, in other words, your ability to put yourself in the others’ situation.
Comic Strip Task (CST) cognitive task (Vo¨llm et al., 2006). how well one can correctly assess other individuals’
mental states (desires, intentions, and beliefs).
測驗中參與者要看一系列的漫畫,接著從幾個漫畫選項中選一個最適合的格子讓主角會覺得比較好的結果來完成故事。

這個測驗被認為太簡單了,可能不能夠完整地測量到同理心。而且相關的心理計量驗證還很少。
Picture Story Stimuli (PSS) cognitive task (Nummenmaa et al., 2008). the ability to interpret visual scenes and predict the most likely behavioral consequence based on cognitive or affective cues. 參與者被要求要看著照片,或是同理照片當中的情境(照片有中性和aversive兩種)

目前使用這個測驗的研究還很少,相關的信效度還有待驗證
Kids’ Empathetic Development Scale (KEDS) cognitive task (Reid et al., 2012). Cognitive, affective, and behavioral components of empathy are examined using emotion recognition, picture based scenarios, and behavioral self-report techniques. 主要測量學童的情緒狀態理解以及同理行為
1.情緒辨識:你知道這個男/女孩感到怎麼樣?
2.認知同理:你可以告訴我為什麼他會這樣覺得嗎?
3.同理行為:你會怎麼做?如果你是那個男/女孩的話。

總共有六個故事情境
Facial Electromyography (EMG) physiological activity

同理心量表(例如BEES)分數高底和在觀看情緒圖片時的表情肌肉活動量有相關。同理心特質較高者,其肌肉活動較大。

留言

這個網誌中的熱門文章

聽完社會認知測驗後感想

先說結論 夭壽讚 今天聽團隊內另一個博士後研究員李士捷分享社會認知評估測驗 本來我只預期會聽到目前有什麼測驗,在測什麼能力或是特質 結果李博士前言後語不缺地完整介紹了社會認知能力的重要性以及目前的測驗所延伸的一些發現 這些測驗包含了情緒辨識測驗以及社會知識、弦外之音(言下之意)測驗 聽完很有啟發性,似乎看到了些模糊的影子 ​

溝通技巧OSCE計畫心得

--- --- 今天聽譽騫介紹了目前正在進行的溝通技巧OSCE計畫 所謂的OSCE是指Objective Structured Clinical Examination,在許多與臨床相關的領域都很常使用這個方法來訓練以及測驗實習生們。藉由與標準病人的互動過程,考官們可以觀察到考生在實際上遇到臨床的狀況時如何展現其臨床實務相關的技巧。而考生們也可以藉此練習相關的專業能力以及溝通應對能力。 從我搜尋到的資料以及詢問臨床心理師或是諮商心理師的朋友的結果,有的同理心的訓練也有像這樣子的歷程,不過標準病人並不一定有那麼標準的訓練。 在討論的過程中也和譽騫請教了他認為同理心在實務上的重要性,覺得在某些情況下可能重要性沒有那麼容易被感覺的。也許可以再多問問其他的人,瞭解一下目前大家是怎麼樣的感覺。也比較可以擬定戰略方向,如何說服相關人員,同理的重要性!

要搬家了

 即日起要搬家到github上用hugo 產生的網站 網址在這 https://juyujeng.github.io/researchlife/ 要搬家有許多的原因,其中最大的一個原因應該是架到github上對於慣用markdown寫筆記的我來說,我可以先在我的obsidian上面打好一切的草稿,然後就可以快速地發佈了 此外,將來如果要分享與統計分析相關的技術性文章,程式碼、結果圖表等的呈現也可以用現成的markdown file就搞定了,方便很多。 最後,自己架出來的就是比較有趣 一點啦