測量一般人的同理心量表

--- title: 測量一般人的同理心量表 author: Ju tags: - blog - empathy - measurement - inventory target: 一般人 category: blog ---

測量一般人的同理心量表

同理心是一個複雜但是十分重要的能力，特別是對於經常需要處理人與人之間相處的工作尤其重要，例如醫療專業人員。近來更是連警察都被要求需要有同理心，稱呼別人要小心（新聞）。

先前回顧了許多測量醫療專業人員的同理能力高低的量表，但有沒有測量非醫療專業人員的工具呢？

我從scopus搜尋了幾個關鍵字，包含了empathy、measurement、tool、assessment、reliability、validity等，並在幾篇回顧性文章的幫助之下找到了不少測量非醫療專業人員的測量工具。其中絕大多是自陳式量表，用來評估填答者自身的同理心能力或是人格特質，少部份是認知測驗。

若是要評估他人的同理心的量表非常的稀少。目前只有看到有：

[[Other Dyadic Perspective-Taking scale]]：由伴侶評量感受到的另一伴的同理心
[[Perceived empathy in online community]]：由作答者評量在社群網路上感受到被社群同理的程度
[[Griffith Empathy Measure]]：由父母評量孩子可以同理他人的能力

評估他人的同理能力的量表非常的稀少這一點並不意外，畢竟一般人在生活中鮮有需要去評估他人同理心能力高低的時候。就算有，通常也只要自己在心裡面有個底就好，不需要實際上量化出來。除非像是伴侶接受伴侶治療時，也許治療師需要評估一下伴侶雙方對對方的感受時需要，又或者父母想要了解孩子的同理（心智）發展的情況，才需要將其量化。

因此，若要發展一般人使用的同理心評估量表，自評的看來已有不少現存工具。若要評他人的同理心能力，也許需要先想想使用的情境，畢竟機會真的不多。

測驗清單

測驗	模型	目標對象
Toronto Empathy Questionnaire	reflective	一般人
Empathy Quotient	reflective	一般人

Hogan’s empathy scale	reflective	一般人
Questionnaire of Cognitive and Affective Empathy (QCAE)	reflective	一般人
Basic Empathy Scale (BES)	reflective	青少年、一般人

青少年復原力量表	reflective	青少年
short form Empathy Quotient	reflective	一般人
Perceived empathy in online community	formative	一般人
questionnaire measure of emotional empathy (QMEE)	reflective	一般人
Other Dyadic Perspective-Taking scale	reflective	一般人
Multidimensional Emotional Empathy Scale	reflective	一般人、青少年

interpersonal reactivity inventory	reflective	一般人
Griffith Empathy Measure	reflective	兒童
Feeling and Thinking Scale	reflective	兒童
Balanced Emotional Empathy Scale (BEES)	reflective	一般人

參考文獻

主要

Hemmerdinger, J. M., Stoddart, S. D., & Lilford, R. J. (2007). A systematic review of tests of empathy in medicine. BMC Medical Education, 7(1), 24. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-7-24

Ilgunaite, G., Giromini, L., & Girolamo, M. D. (n.d.). Measuring empathy: A literature review of available tools. 28.

Neumann, David. L., Chan, R. C. K., Boyle, Gregory. J., Wang, Y., & Rae Westbury, H. (2015). Measures of Empathy. In Measures of Personality and Social Psychological Constructs (pp. 257–289). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-386915-9.00010-3

Yu, J., & Kirk, M. (2009). Evaluation of empathy measurement tools in nursing: Systematic review. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 65(9), 1790–1806. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2009.05071.x

其他相關文獻

詹雨臻, 葉玉珠, 彭月茵, & 葉碧瑜. (2009). 「青少年復原力量表」之發展. 測驗學刊, 56(4), 491–518. https://doi.org/10.7108/PT.200912.0491

Allison, C., Baron-Cohen, S., Wheelwright, S. J., Stone, M. H., & Muncer, S. J. (2011). Psychometric analysis of the Empathy Quotient (EQ). Personality and Individual Differences, 51(7), 829–835. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2011.07.005

Alloway, T. P., Copello, E., Loesch, M., Soares, C., Watkins, J., Miller, D., Campell, G., Tarter, A., Law, N., Soares, C., & Ray, S. (2016). Investigating the reliability and validity of the Multidimensional Emotional Empathy Scale. Measurement, 90, 438–442. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2016.05.014

Baron-Cohen, S., & Wheelwright, S. (2004). The Empathy Quotient: An Investigation of Adults with Asperger Syndrome or High Functioning Autism, and Normal Sex Differences. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 34(2), 163–175. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JADD.0000022607.19833.00

Carré, A., Stefaniak, N., D’Ambrosio, F., Bensalah, L., & Besche-Richard, C. (2013). The Basic Empathy Scale in Adults (BES-A): Factor structure of a revised form. Psychological Assessment, 25(3), 679–691. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032297

Caruso, D. R., & Mayer, J. D. (1998). A Measure of Emotional Empathy for Adolescents and Adults.

Chiang, S.-K., Hua, M.-S., Tam, W.-C. C., Chao, J.-K., & Shiah, Y.-J. (2014). Developing an Alternative Chinese Version of the Interpersonal Reactivity Index for Normal Population and Patients with Schizophrenia in Taiwan. Brain Impairment, 15(2), 120–131. https://doi.org/10.1017/BrImp.2014.15

Coll, M.-P., Viding, E., Rütgen, M., Silani, G., Lamm, C., Catmur, C., & Bird, G. (2017). Are we really measuring empathy? Proposal for a new measurement framework. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 83, 132–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.10.009

Dadds, M. R., Hunter, K., Hawes, D. J., Frost, A. D. J., Vassallo, S., Bunn, P., Merz, S., & Masry, Y. E. (2008a). A Measure of Cognitive and Affective Empathy in Children Using Parent Ratings. Child Psychiatry and Human Development, 39(2), 111–122. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10578-007-0075-4

Dadds, M. R., Hunter, K., Hawes, D. J., Frost, A. D. J., Vassallo, S., Bunn, P., Merz, S., & Masry, Y. E. (2008b). A Measure of Cognitive and Affective Empathy in Children Using Parent Ratings. Child Psychiatry and Human Development, 39(2), 111–122. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10578-007-0075-4

Davis, M. H. (1980). A multidimensional approach to individual differences in empathy.

Davis, M. H. (1983). Measuring Individual Differences in Empathy: Evidence for a Multidimensional Approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44(1), 113–126. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.44.1.113

Dziobek, I., Rogers, K., Fleck, S., Bahnemann, M., Heekeren, H. R., Wolf, O. T., & Convit, A. (2008). Dissociation of Cognitive and Emotional Empathy in Adults with Asperger Syndrome Using the Multifaceted Empathy Test (MET). Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 38(3), 464–473. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-007-0486-x

Garton, A. (n.d.). The development of a scale to measure empathy in 8- and 9-year old children. 9.

Gerdes, K. E., Lietz, C. A., & Segal, E. A. (2011). Measuring Empathy in the 21st Century: Development of an Empathy Index Rooted in Social Cognitive Neuroscience and Social Justice. Social Work Research, 35(2), 83–93. https://doi.org/10.1093/swr/35.2.83

Hemmerdinger, J. M., Stoddart, S. D., & Lilford, R. J. (2007). A systematic review of tests of empathy in medicine. BMC Medical Education, 7(1), 24. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-7-24

Hogan, R. (1969). Development of an empathy scale. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 33(3), 307–316. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0027580

Jolliffe, D., & Farrington, D. P. (2006). Development and validation of the Basic Empathy Scale. Journal of Adolescence, 29(4), 589–611. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2005.08.010

Lawrence, E. J., Shaw, P., Baker, D., Baron-Cohen, S., & David, A. S. (2004). Measuring empathy: Reliability and validity of the Empathy Quotient. Psychological Medicine, 34(5), 911–920. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291703001624

Lelorain, S., Brédart, A., Dolbeault, S., & Sultan, S. (2012). A systematic review of the associations between empathy measures and patient outcomes in cancer care: Associations between empathy and outcomes. Psycho-Oncology, 21(12), 1255–1264. https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.2115

Long, E. C. J. (1990). Measuring Dyadic Perspective-Taking: Two Scales for Assessing Perspective-Taking in Marriage and Similar Dyads. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 50(1), 91–103. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164490501008

Mehrabian, A., & Epstein, N. (1972). A measure of emotional empathy. Journal of Personality, 40(4), 525–543. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1972.tb00078.x

Murphy, B. A., & Lilienfeld, S. O. (2019). Are self-report cognitive empathy ratings valid proxies for cognitive empathy ability? Negligible meta-analytic relations with behavioral task performance. Psychological Assessment, 31(8), 1062–1072. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000732

Nambisan, P. (2011). Information seeking and social support in online health communities: Impact on patients’ perceived empathy. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 18(3), 298–304. https://doi.org/10.1136/amiajnl-2010-000058

Reniers, R. L. E. P., Corcoran, R., Drake, R., Shryane, N. M., & Völlm, B. A. (2011). The QCAE: A Questionnaire of Cognitive and Affective Empathy. Journal of Personality Assessment, 93(1), 84–95. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2010.528484

Spreng*, R. N., McKinnon*, M. C., Mar, R. A., & Levine, B. (2009). The Toronto Empathy Questionnaire: Scale Development and Initial Validation of a Factor-Analytic Solution to Multiple Empathy Measures. Journal of Personality Assessment, 91(1), 62–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223890802484381

Vellante, M., Baron-Cohen, S., Melis, M., Marrone, M., Petretto, D. R., Masala, C., & Preti, A. (2013). The “Reading the Mind in the Eyes” test: Systematic review of psychometric properties and a validation study in Italy. Cognitive Neuropsychiatry, 18(4), 326–354. https://doi.org/10.1080/13546805.2012.721728

Wakabayashi, A., Baron-Cohen, S., Wheelwright, S., Goldenfeld, N., Delaney, J., Fine, D., Smith, R., & Weil, L. (2006). Development of short forms of the Empathy Quotient (EQ-Short) and the Systemizing Quotient (SQ-Short). Personality and Individual Differences, 41(5), 929–940. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2006.03.017

認知彈性的定義與作業分析

認知彈性定義與作業分析認知彈性的定義認知彈性是執行控制功能的核心能力之一 [1] ，是一種高等的認知功能。關於認知彈性的定義在過去的研究中有些不同的看法。根據Ionescu [2] 的整理，認知彈性在過去的研究中可以分為四種定義是一種可以在不同的作業間快速切換注意力的能力是一種同時處理或是表徵多組訊息的能力能夠以不同的角度（或方式）思考同一件事情的能力對於環境變動能夠適應的認知歷程這四種定義所指涉的認知彈性層次不太一樣。前兩種是一種認知能力，看來與認知資源或是注意力有高度關係，與認知資源或是注意力資源的使用的好壞或是效率有關。而第三種則是較高等的一種思考歷程，應該也包含了第2個定義的能力，要能夠同時知道同一個事物的不同面向的訊息，才有辦法從另一個角度來理解或是看待它。而第四種定義則是一種認知系統，其複雜程度比起前面的能力或是歷程更高，可能是多種不同的能力或是認知機制、歷程間的合作或是交互作用後的產物。我認為第4個定義最符合我心中對於認知彈性的想像，能屈能伸，能隨著環境的變化而產生相對應的策略或是反應，比較像是一個「有彈性的人」。要能夠測量到這個能力，作業本身需要會變化，而且要能夠捕捉個體是否能隨著作業需求的改變而做出調整。測量認知彈性的作業有許多測量認知彈性的作業，不同的作業所測量到的認知彈性並不相同。其中歷史最悠久，在臨床上被使用最多的應該是Wisconsin Card Sorting Task，而在認知實驗室當中被研究最多的大概是task switch、Stroop test，或者是Alternative uses task。而這些測驗之外，還有一些對於適用對象的修改版測驗，以下分別介紹。 Wisconsin Card Sorting Task (WCST) WCST是一個經典的神經心理衡鑑作業。受測者的作業目的就是一張一張地將卡片分類。他們可以根據卡片上圖案的不同的屬性來分類。施測者的心中有一套分類的規則，但是不會告訴受測者，受測者只能依據每一張分類之後施測者的回饋來猜測他心中的規則是什麼，以達到最高正確率的分類表現。然而，規則是會變的，可能在幾次正確的分類之後，規則就改變了。受測者要能夠覺察到自己分類規則已經不適用了，需要換一個規則來分類試試。最後完成測驗時所正確分類的卡片數量就是一個認知彈性的指標。在這個測驗當中，作業的要求沒有...

研究追尋

搜尋此網誌